Born in 1912. Graduates Kyoto Budo Senmon
Gakkou(Busen) in 1938. Becomes an assistant professor at Kochi High
School in the same year, and flies to Shanghai Toa Dobunshoin University
in 1940. Stays in Shikoku after WWII for a while, until he flies to
France in 1953. He currently runs a dojo in Bordeaux. As the director
of arts of the Dutch Judo Federation, he trains Geesink with 6 Dan.
7 Dan in Judo.
|
 The
Tokyo Olympic games are coming up next October. Left with only 600 more
days, how has Japan improved as the motherland of Judo?
 There
is no way for anyone to think that Japan is invincible. Japan's panic
after the Third World Championships in Paris must have been an awful sight
for the foreigners.
 Even
I, who was in Holland at the time, was easily able to imagine the scene
of confusion.
 Japan
said that they needed to concentrate more on ground tactics, and that
power overwhelmed technique to rationalize the loss.
 However,
this reasoning is not acceptable. Isn't power part of technique? Although
power is not technique itself, but power is a necessary factor in optimizing
one's technique.
 To
optimize technique(physically and geometrically), is it essential for
one to have a strong mind and body(muscular strength and speed). The training
which I made Geesink go through was always done in that manner, to realize
which muscle(s) are necessary to fight.
 It
is not a coincidence, but rather inevitable for Geesink to win. The comment
that power overwhelmed technique is invalid whatsoever.
 There
is no problem if someone from the public thinks that way. However, it
is great trouble when the leaders of Japanese judo say that to evade responsibility.
 There
are two wishes that I have.
 One
is for the leaders to admit the loss and accept the responsibility.
 And
the other is for Japanese judo to go through a reform, in which men with
abilities lead the organization.
 Without
these, Japan is in danger for the Tokyo Olympics. If Japan loses in front
of the whole world, judo will not be a Japanese specialty anymore. |